deepseek-harness vs AutoGPT
Real adoption data from 350 days of tracking. Updated 2026-10-27.
Quick Take
deepseek-harness is growing faster (+3.2% vs +0.1%)
Based on 350 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 3.2% weekly growth.
📊 Head to Head
Total Stars
Growth Rate
Stars Gained
📈 Star Growth Over Time
Based on 350 days of RepoPi snapshots
● deepseek-harness
● AutoGPT
🔍 At a Glance
deepseek-harness
AutoGPT
Language
TypeScript
Python
Stars
263.3k
187.8k
Growth (350d)
+157.6%
+4.6%
Primary Topics
ai-agents, cordis, dsh
agentic-ai, agents, ai
Choose deepseek-harness when...
- You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
- You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
- You value a large, active community (263.3k+ stars)
- You prefer a project with proven momentum (+157.6% tracked growth)
Choose AutoGPT when...
- You work primarily in the Python ecosystem
- You need agentic-ai, agents capabilities
- You value a large, active community (187.8k+ stars)
- You prefer a project with proven momentum (+4.6% tracked growth)