ECC vs deepseek-harness

Real adoption data from 295 days of tracking. Updated 2026-09-02.

Quick Take

deepseek-harness is growing faster (+6.5% vs +1.1%)

Based on 295 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 6.5% weekly growth.

📊 Head to Head

Total Stars
⭐ 246.0k
⭐ 209.0k
Growth Rate
↑1.1%
↑6.5%
Stars Gained
+59.1k
+106.8k

📈 Star Growth Over Time

Based on 295 days of RepoPi snapshots

● ECC ● deepseek-harness

🔍 At a Glance

ECC
deepseek-harness
Language
JavaScript
TypeScript
Stars
246.0k
209.0k
Growth (295d)
+31.6%
+104.5%
Primary Topics
ai-agents, anthropic, claude
ai-agents, cordis, dsh

Choose ECC when...

  • You work primarily in the JavaScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, anthropic capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (246.0k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+31.6% tracked growth)
Full ECC analysis →

Choose deepseek-harness when...

  • You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (209.0k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+104.5% tracked growth)
Full deepseek-harness analysis →