ECC vs deepseek-harness

Real adoption data from 350 days of tracking. Updated 2026-10-27.

⚡

Quick Take

deepseek-harness is growing faster (+3.2% vs +2.1%)

Based on 350 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 3.2% weekly growth.

📊 Head to Head

Total Stars
⭐ 290.3k
⭐ 263.3k
Growth Rate
↑2.1%
↑3.2%
Stars Gained
+103.5k
+161.1k

📈 Star Growth Over Time

Based on 350 days of RepoPi snapshots

● ECC ● deepseek-harness

🔍 At a Glance

ECC
deepseek-harness
Language
JavaScript
TypeScript
Stars
290.3k
263.3k
Growth (350d)
+55.4%
+157.6%
Primary Topics
ai-agents, anthropic, claude
ai-agents, cordis, dsh

Choose ECC when...

  • You work primarily in the JavaScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, anthropic capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (290.3k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+55.4% tracked growth)
Full ECC analysis →

Choose deepseek-harness when...

  • You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (263.3k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+157.6% tracked growth)
Full deepseek-harness analysis →